Money Follows the Person: A 2013 State Survey of Transitions, Services, and Costs
To date, 45 states (including DC) have received Money Follows the Person (MFP) demonstration grants to transition Medicaid beneficiaries from institutions to the community. Authorized by Congress in 2005 and extended through 2016 by the Affordable Care Act (ACA), MFP provides enhanced federal funding for 12 months for each participating Medicaid beneficiary. Of the 45 states, 42 are currently operational, two states are not yet operational and one state’s demonstration is inactive. In August 2013, the Kaiser Family Foundation’s Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured surveyed all MFP states about enrollment trends, services, and per capita spending in their demonstrations. States also were asked to describe the interactions between MFP and the ACA’s new and expanded long-term services and supports (LTSS) options and any state managed LTSS (MLTSS) programs. New companion papers profile MFP demonstrations in two states – Maryland and Tennessee – as well as the experiences of four MFP participants.1
As of August 2013, over 35,400 Medicaid beneficiaries had enrolled in MFP and another 5,780 transitions were in progress. Forty percent of all MFP transitions occurred in three states (OH, TX, and WA), with the most cumulative transitions in Texas (7,307 or 21%). The majority of MFP participants nationally are persons with physical disabilities (38%) and seniors (37.5%). One in five MFP participants (19%) has an intellectual/developmental disability (I/DD); 5 percent have a mental illness. Over 10,300 Medicaid beneficiaries moved to the community through MFP between 2012 and 2013 (Figure 1). On average, MFP participants were 58 years old, took 3.5 months to transition and most often moved to an apartment. States also reported an 11 percent reinstitutionalization rate across all target populations.
Access to comprehensive pre- and post-transition services enables MFP participants with a range of chronic and disabling conditions to successfully return to the community. MFP participants receive benefits provided under existing home and community-based services (HCBS) waivers and state plan benefits packages, as well as MFP demonstration services (37 states) and supplemental services (18 states). Sixteen states offer both demonstration and supplemental services. Examples include transition coordination, one-time housing expenses (e.g., security or utility deposits and household set-up costs), assistive technology, employment skills training, 24-hour back-up nursing, peer community support, and ombudsman services. Demonstration services are additional HCBS beyond the existing state plan or waiver benefits package and are funded at the enhanced MFP federal matching rate during the individual’s participation year. Supplemental services are not necessarily long-term care in nature (e.g., coverage of one-time transition costs or services only offered during the transition year) and are reimbursed at the state’s regular federal matching rate.
The average monthly cost of serving an MFP participant in the community was $3,934 per person in 2013, lower than the amount reported in 2012 ($4,432). Average MFP monthly costs were highest for individuals with I/DD ($7,496) followed by individuals with physical disabilities ($2,870), individuals with mental illness ($2,603),2 and seniors ($2,204). All states reported that per capita costs of serving MFP beneficiaries were lower than those for institutionalized Medicaid beneficiaries (26 states responded). Thirteen states said per capita service costs for MFP participants were comparable to those for other Medicaid beneficiaries receiving HCBS, seven states reported lower costs for MFP participants, and six states reported higher costs for MFP participants.
Lack of safe, affordable, and accessible housing and difficulty coordinating multiple LTSS initiatives alongside MFP were cited as the biggest challenges facing MFP grantees in the year ahead. States have repeatedly cited the lack of housing options as the biggest barrier to MFP transitions since the demonstration began in 2008, with 20 states identifying this issue in 2013. States reported the need for additional community housing resources to accommodate increasingly complex populations with medical and behavioral health needs. States also were focused on coordinating MFP with the ACA’s new and expanded LTSS rebalancing options, such as the Balancing Incentive Program, and on the expansion of MLTSS. Twenty-four MFP states reported operating or planning an MLTSS program that will include MFP participants. States also reported working with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to navigate enrolling MFP participants in the new financial and administrative alignment demonstrations for dually eligible beneficiaries.
Looking ahead, 2014 will be a transformative year for the Medicaid program, as millions of individuals become newly eligible and states adjust to the ACA’s eligibility and enrollment changes. Managing multiple competing demands will be a challenge for MFP program staff, especially those simultaneously involved in the Balancing Incentive Program and other new ACA LTSS options. Lessons learned from MFP will help states prioritize resources and build on existing rebalancing efforts. MFP participants repeatedly cite increased independence, regained freedom, and greater access to the community as key benefits of moving home.3 Increased outreach about HCBS (often provided by Aging and Disability Resource Centers), support and training of HCBS providers, flexible benefit design such as access to a one-time allowance to cover moving expenses and home modifications, and enhanced federal funding all have contributed to helping thousands of Medicaid MFP beneficiaries return to the community.
also of interest
- Money Follows the Person Demonstration Program: Helping Medicaid Beneficiaries Move Back Home
- Maryland’s Money Follows the Person Demonstration: Support Transitions Through Enhanced Services and Technology
- Tennessee’s Money Follows the Person Demonstration: Supporting Rebalancing in a Managed Long-Term Services and Supports Model