Filling the need for trusted information on national health issues…

The Hyde Amendment and Coverage for Abortion Services

Since the Supreme Court’s 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade, abortion has been squarely in the middle of political debates at the national and state levels.  Soon after the Court’s ruling, Congress enacted the Hyde Amendment which blocks federal funds from being used to pay for abortion outside of the exceptions for rape, incest, or if the pregnancy is determined to endanger the woman’s life. Since its passage 40 years ago, the law has dramatically limited coverage of abortion under Medicaid, as well as other federal programs. The amendment was sponsored and supported by legislators who opposed abortion and, in particular, objected to the federal government’s use of taxpayer money for abortion services. The policy was not passed as a permanent law, but rather was attached as a temporary “rider” to the Congressional appropriations bill for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Since then, the Hyde Amendment has been renewed annually by Congress. While abortion policy has been a hotly contested issue in most presidential elections, the Hyde Amendment has not been the focus of these debates until this current election. Following their party’s platforms, Hillary Clinton, the Democratic candidate, has called for the repeal of the Hyde Amendment, and Donald J. Trump, the Republican candidate, has called for the annual provision to become permanent law.1 Any change to the policy would require approval by Congress, which is unlikely given its current composition. This perspective details the federal programs that are affected by the Hyde Amendment, provides estimates on the share of women insured by Medicaid affected by the law, the impact on their access to abortion services, and the potential effect if the law were to be repealed or codified.

What programs does the Hyde Amendment affect?

Initially, the Hyde Amendment only affected funding for abortions under Medicaid, a state and federal health program for low-income individuals. Because it is reauthorized annually as an attachment to the appropriations bill for HHS, the Hyde Amendment’s reach also includes the Indian Health Service, Medicare, and the Children’s Health Insurance Program. In addition, language similar to that in the Hyde Amendment has been incorporated into a range of other federal programs that provide or pay for health services to women including: the military’s TRICARE program, federal prisons, the Peace Corps, and the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program.  The Affordable Care Act (ACA) also included a provision that applied similar abortion coverage limitations to plans that are sold through the Marketplace for women who receive federal income-based subsidies to purchase private health insurance.

Because Medicaid is jointly funded by the federal and state governments, states can choose to pay for abortions under Medicaid in other instances, but must use their own revenues, and not federal funds, to cover the service. Currently, 17 states have a policy directing the use of their own funds to pay for abortions for low-income women insured by Medicaid beyond the Hyde limitations, 11 of which provide coverage as the result of a court order (Figure 1).2 Still, the state Medicaid programs in Arizona and Illinois do not pay for abortions outside of circumstances permitted by Hyde despite court orders directing them to do so.

Figure 1: Few States Use their Own Funds to Extend Abortion Coverage to Women on Medicaid

Figure 1: Few States Use their Own Funds to Extend Abortion Coverage to Women on Medicaid

What is the Hyde Amendment’s impact on women on Medicaid?

Medicaid is a significant and growing source of health coverage for low-income women in the nation. Today, Medicaid covers two in ten women of reproductive age (15-49). In 2015, nearly half (47%) of women below the Federal Poverty Level (FPL) were insured by Medicaid (Figure 2).3 The ACA has enabled states to increase eligibility for Medicaid to 138% of the FPL ($20,160 for a family of three in 2016).  However, 19 states have not expanded the program. In those states, the median income eligibility limit is just 47% of the FPL, or an annual income of $9,442.30 for a family of three.

Figure 2: Medicaid Plays An Important Role for Women Who Are Poor, Minorities, or in Poorer Health

Figure 2: Medicaid Plays An Important Role for Women Who Are Poor, Minorities, or in Poorer Health

Despite the news that unintended pregnancy and abortion rates have fallen in the general population, abortions are becoming increasingly concentrated among poor women and black women.  Women of color are more likely than white women to be insured by Medicaid, and have higher rates of unintended pregnancy and abortion.45 In 2014, 75% of abortions were among low-income patients, and 64% were among black or Latina women (Figure 3).6 Young adults and teens, who are less likely to have a steady source of income, make up the majority (72%) of abortion patients.7

Figure 3: Women Who Get Abortions are Disproportionately Low-Income, Young and Racial/Ethnic Minorities

Figure 3: Women Who Get Abortions are Disproportionately Low-Income, Young and Racial/Ethnic Minorities

Without coverage for abortion under Medicaid, women must pay out-of-pocket for the procedure. Costs vary by location, facility, and gestational age, but on average an abortion costs $485 among women who had out-of-pocket costs, with some paying upwards of $3500.8 Hillary Clinton has argued that the Hyde Amendment creates a barrier for poor and low-income women who have limited means to pay for an abortion on their own, “making it harder for [them] to exercise their full rights.”9 In contrast, Donald Trump committed to “protect taxpayers from having to pay for abortions” in a recent letter announcing the creation of his new “pro-life coalition.”10

What would be the impact on abortion coverage if the Hyde Restrictions were lifted?

As a rider to the annual appropriations bill that Congress must pass in order to fund the operations of federal programs, the Hyde Amendment affects millions of women. If the ban were lifted, it could potentially provide federal support for abortion coverage for the 14.5 million reproductive-age women enrolled in Medicaid, as well as millions of others in similarly restricted federal programs. In particular, it could broaden abortion coverage for 8.5 million women on Medicaid who live in 35 states and the District of Columbia (Table 1) that currently follow Hyde restrictions, which represents over half (58%) of reproductive-age women enrolled in Medicaid (Figure 4).11

Figure 4: More than Half of Reproductive-Age Women with Medicaid Lack Abortion Coverage

Figure 4: More than Half of Reproductive-Age Women with Medicaid Lack Abortion Coverage

A recent study found that in 2014 52% of abortion patients residing in states that use their own funds to pay for abortion had the procedure covered by Medicaid, compared to 1.5% of patients who live in states adhering to Hyde restrictions. 12 This stark differential strongly suggests that if abortion coverage were expanded under Medicaid, the number of abortions paid for by the program would rise. However, the extent of the change in Medicaid-funded abortions would likely vary considerably by state as it will be affected by a range of factors including state laws, reimbursement rates, and the availability of providers. For example, some states have (or could enact) laws that would prohibit state dollars from being used for abortion in the same way that they ban coverage through private plans and the ACA Marketplace plans.  Advocates who support abortion rights are working to counteract these efforts through federal legislation such as the EACH Woman Act, which would prohibit the federal and state governments from restricting insurance coverage for abortion in both public and private health insurance programs. Advocates who oppose abortion are working to make Hyde permanent law and are endorsing the passage of legislation such as the Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which focuses on restricting later term abortion procedures.

The removal of the Hyde Amendment from the appropriations bill would also affect nearly one million women of reproductive age who are currently enrolled in Medicare,13 and many others who receive their care through the Indian Health Service and the Children’s Health Insurance Program. In order for women in the military and the Peace Corps, federal employees, and others who are receiving federally funded health benefits (outside of the HHS Appropriations bill) to obtain abortion coverage, the Hyde-like provisions would either need to be repealed from the authorizing law or lifted from the Congressionally approved appropriations bills that fund those federal programs.

For the first time, the Democratic Platform has called for the repeal of the Hyde Amendment, which the party asserts impedes a woman’s constitutional right to an abortion. While this statement sets a significant precedent for a presidential candidate’s public position on the issue, it would need sufficient support among members of Congress to make this policy change. Prior efforts to lift the federal funding ban by abortion rights supporters have not been successful and given the current make-up of the House and Senate, it would still be very challenging to pass.  The Republican Party, on the other hand, seeks to codify the Hyde Amendment, thus permanently limiting the use of federal funds for abortion. Anti-abortion advocates efforts to make the Hyde Amendment permanent law have also been blocked by numerous political obstacles, leaving the policy as a temporary law that must be approved annually.

Despite higher shares of women with private insurance and Medicaid resulting from the coverage expansions established by the ACA, coverage for abortion services remains limited. While the removal of the Hyde Amendment could broaden this abortion coverage for millions of poor and low-income women who receive federally subsidized health coverage, the true impact of such a policy change may vary by program and state.  As we mark the 40th anniversary of the first time the Hyde Amendment was applied to a federal appropriations bill, the law is still being debated. The current election has refocused the national dialogue on the Hyde Amendment, once again highlighting the importance of elections in shaping health policy for women at the federal and state level.

Table 1: Medicaid Coverage of Women, Ages 15-49
State Total % of Women on Medicaid Number of Women on Medicaid
U.S. Total 73,944,268 20% 14,631,053
Alabama 1,119,297 15% 166,163
Alaska 159,825 18% 29,103
Arizona* 1,554,888 28% 440,863
Arkansas 658,008 20% 130,574
California 9,442,869 27% 2,527,938
Colorado 1,281,938 17% 216,267
Connecticut 825,000 18% 151,256
Delaware 212,316 20% 42,554
DC 200,970 27% 53,344
Florida 4,494,953 18% 809,722
Georgia 2,478,112 19% 459,244
Hawaii 304,040 21% 63,943
Idaho 367,107 16% 58,853
Illinois* 2,946,279 21% 605,533
Indiana 1,485,359 20% 298,151
Iowa 675,086 18% 122,692
Kansas 650,312 11% 69,592
Kentucky 983,786 22% 216,091
Louisiana 1,087,988 20% 218,836
Maine 271,149 30% 80,956
Maryland 1,401,411 16% 225,910
Massachusetts 1,574,975 26% 402,297
Michigan 2,184,121 21% 456,511
Minnesota 1,229,732 16% 201,705
Mississippi 690,817 20% 135,424
Missouri 1,386,673 13% 177,189
Montana 214,563 15% 32,428
Nebraska 420,306 13% 54,509
Nevada 656,868 18% 120,692
New Hampshire 284,767 16% 44,737
New Jersey 2,075,490 20% 414,069
New Mexico 464,364 30% 139,584
New York 4,560,159 25% 1,120,592
North Carolina 2,355,191 15% 364,291
North Dakota 165,770 13% 21,777
Ohio 2,603,966 25% 643,091
Oklahoma 885,018 14% 123,178
Oregon 923,656 27% 251,108
Pennsylvania 2,788,341 20% 554,086
Rhode Island 240,218 18% 44,000
South Carolina 1,097,003 18% 201,938
South Dakota** 178,478 12% 22,228
Tennessee 1,504,497 20% 294,330
Texas 6,618,514 11% 745,506
Utah 726,741 11% 81,369
Vermont 134,323 18% 24,797
Virginia 1,937,350 9% 183,458
Washington 1,666,383 22% 373,532
West Virginia 380,832 37% 139,239
Wisconsin 1,287,440 20% 263,017
Wyoming 127,016 10% 12,785
NOTES: Numbers may not add up due to rounding.
*Arizona and Illinois follow Hyde restrictions despite court orders to fund all medically necessary abortions.
** South Dakota pays for abortion only in cases of life endangerment.
Blue shading indicates states restricting Medicaid abortion coverage to Hyde Amendment rules.
SOURCE: Kaiser Family Foundation analysis based on the 2016 Current Population Survey, U.S. Census Bureau.
Endnotes
  1. Democratic Platform Committee. (2016). 2016 Democratic Party Platform.

    ← Return to text

  2. Guttmacher Institute. (2016). State Funding of Abortion Under Medicaid.

    ← Return to text

  3. Paradise J, Lyons B, Rowland D. Kaiser Family Foundation. (2015). Medicaid at 50.

    ← Return to text

  4. Guttmacher Institute. (2016). Characteristics of U.S. Abortion Patients in 2014 and Changes Since 2008.

    ← Return to text

  5. Guttmacher Institute. (2016). Unintended Pregnancy in the United States.

    ← Return to text

  6. Boonstra H. Guttmacher Institute. (2016). Abortion in the Lives of Women Struggling Financially: Why Insurance Coverage Matters.  Guttmacher Policy Review, vol. 19.

    ← Return to text

  7. Guttmacher Institute. (2016). Induced Abortion in the United States.

    ← Return to text

  8. Roberts S, Gould H, Kimport K, Weitz T, and Greene Foster D. (2014). Out-of-Pocket Costs and Insurance Coverage for Abortion in the United States. Women’s Health Issues Journal, 24(2), e211-e218.

    ← Return to text

  9. C-Span. (2016). Planned Parenthood Endorsement of Hillary Clinton.

    ← Return to text

  10. Trump Letter on Pro-Life Coalition. (2016).

    ← Return to text

  11. Salganicoff A, Sobel L, Kurani N, Gomez I. Kaiser Family Foundation. (2016). Coverage for Abortion Services in Medicaid, Marketplace Plans and Private Plans.

    ← Return to text

  12. Guttmacher Institute. (2016). Characteristics of U.S. Abortion Patients in 2014 and Changes Since 2008.

    ← Return to text

  13. Center for Medicaid Services (CMS). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2014). 2014 CMS Statistics.

     

    ← Return to text

The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation Headquarters: 2400 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025 | Phone 650-854-9400
Washington Offices and Barbara Jordan Conference Center: 1330 G Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005 | Phone 202-347-5270

www.kff.org | Email Alerts: kff.org/email | facebook.com/KaiserFamilyFoundation | twitter.com/KaiserFamFound

Filling the need for trusted information on national health issues, the Kaiser Family Foundation is a nonprofit organization based in Menlo Park, California.