Key Points
  1. Totals represent funding specifically designated by donor governments for family planning as defined by the OECD DAC (see methodology), and include: standalone family planning projects; family planning-specific contributions to multilateral organizations (e.g., contributions to UNFPA Supplies); and, in some cases, projects that include family planning within broader reproductive health activities.

    ← Return to text

  2. At the time of publication, data from France for 2021 were not available. France’s prior year amount was used as a temporary estimate to calculate the overall donor government total in 2021.

    ← Return to text

  3. Includes core-contributions from members of the OECD DAC only; core contributions from non-DAC donors are not included in this total.

    ← Return to text

  4. UNFPA, “Delivering On The Transformative Results: UNFPA Annual Report 2021”, 2021. See also UNFPA Donor Contributions portal.

    ← Return to text

  5. Germany’s decline in 2021 was a return to prior year levels following a significant increase in 2020 that was aimed at supporting UNFPA’s efforts to address the impacts of COVID-19.

    ← Return to text

  6. See KFF’s “UNFPA Funding & Kemp-Kasten: An Explainer”.

    ← Return to text

Report
  1. Includes funding from 29 DAC member countries and the European Union (EU).

    ← Return to text

  2. At the time of publication, data from France for 2021 were not available. France’s prior year amount was used as a temporary estimate to calculate the overall donor government total in 2021.

    ← Return to text

  3. U.K. Foreign Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO), “Statistics on International Development: Provisional UK Aid Spend 2021,” April 2022.

    ← Return to text

  4. For the period between FY17-FY20, the Trump administration invoked the Kemp-Kasten amendment to withhold funding - both core and non-core contributions - from UNFPA (see KFF "UNFPA Funding & Kemp-Kasten: An Explainer"). Congress requires any withheld funding for UNFPA (core-only) be transferred to other global health activities, including family planning. In FY21, the Biden administration resumed funding for UNFPA. When the FY17-FY20 UNFPA transfers to FP are removed, the overall levels match FY21.

    ← Return to text

  5. In 2021, UNFPA spent approximately US$488.7 million (45% of UNFPA’s total program expenses) on family planning activities. This includes US$278.8 million for family-planning specific activities (such as enabling environments for family planning, contraceptives and related supplies, provision of services, and family planning systems strengthening) and US$209.9 million for activities with an impact on family planning results in other areas of work under UNFPA’s mandate. Direct communication, UNFPA, October 2022.

    ← Return to text

  6. U.K. Foreign Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO), “Statistics on International Development: Provisional UK Aid Spend 2021,” April 2022.

    ← Return to text

  7. See KFF’s “UNFPA Funding & Kemp-Kasten: An Explainer”.

    ← Return to text

  8. At the time of publication, data from France for 2021 were not available. France’s prior year amount was used as a temporary estimate to calculate the overall donor government total in 2021.

    ← Return to text

KFF Headquarters: 185 Berry St., Suite 2000, San Francisco, CA 94107 | Phone 650-854-9400
Washington Offices and Barbara Jordan Conference Center: 1330 G Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005 | Phone 202-347-5270

www.kff.org | Email Alerts: kff.org/email | facebook.com/KFF | twitter.com/kff

The independent source for health policy research, polling, and news, KFF is a nonprofit organization based in San Francisco, California.