Donor Government Funding for Family Planning in 2018

Key Points

1. Totals represent disbursements specifically designated by donor governments for family planning as defined by the OECD DAC (see methodology), and include: standalone family planning projects; family planning-specific contributions to multilateral organizations (e.g., contributions to UNFPA Supplies); and, in some cases, projects that include family planning within broader reproductive health activities.

   ← Return to text

2. Includes core-contributions from members of the OECD DAC only; core contributions from non-DAC donors are not included in this total.

   ← Return to text

Report

1. FP2020, London Summit on Family Planning: Summaries of Commitments, December 2013, available at: http://www.familyplanning2020.org/about-us.

   ← Return to text

2. FP2020, The Family Planning Summit for Safer, Healthier and Empowered Futures, July 2017, available at: http://summit2017.familyplanning2020.org/.

   ← Return to text

3. Includes funding from 29 DAC member countries and the European Union (EU).

   ← Return to text

4. In FY17 and FY18, the U.S. administration invoked the Kemp-Kasten amendment to withhold funding – both core and non-core contributions – to UNFPA. In FY16, U.S. contributions to UNFPA had totaled $69 million, including $30.7 million in core resources and an additional $38.3 million in non-core resources for other project activities (see KFF “UNFPA Funding & Kemp-Kasten: An Explainer”).

   ← Return to text

5. OECD, The List of CRS Purpose Codes and Voluntary Budget Identifier Codes, June 2018.

   ← Return to text

Appendices

1. UNFPA, Direct communication, September, 2019.

   ← Return to text

2. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Direct communication, October, 2019.

   ← Return to text