How Are Hospitals Faring Under the Affordable Care Act? Early Experiences from Ascension Health
Table 1: Change in Ascension Health Inpatient Discharge Volume, by Payer, 2013-2014 | ||||
Q2-4, 2013 |
Q1-3, 2014 |
Δ, 2013-2014 |
% Δ, 2013-2014 |
|
Total discharges for Ascension system | ||||
Total | 578,029 | 564,193 | -13,836 | -2.4 |
Medicaid | 88,524 | 91,775 | 3,251 | 3.7 |
Medicare | 269,982 | 262,839 | -7.143 | -2.6 |
Commercial | 158,965 | 156,964 | -2,001 | -1.3 |
Uninsured/self-pay | 33,383 | 29,798 | -3,585 | -10.7 |
Expansion States Discharges | ||||
Total | 195,869 | 189,462 | -6,407 | -3.3 |
Medicaid | 33,611 | 36,112 | 2,501 | 7.4 |
Medicare | 95,409 | 91,770 | -3,639 | -3.8 |
Commercial | 53,205 | 51,372 | -1,833 | -3.4 |
Uninsured | 7,597 | 5,144 | -2,453 | -32.3 |
Non-Expansion States Discharges | ||||
Total | 382,160 | 374,731 | -7,429 | -1.9 |
Medicaid | 54,913 | 55,663 | 750 | 1.4 |
Medicare | 174,573 | 171,069 | -3,504 | -2.0 |
Commercial | 105,760 | 105,592 | -168 | -0.2 |
Uninsured | 25,786 | 24,654 | -1,132 | -4.4 |
Note: Expansion states include CT, DC, IL, MD, MI, NY, WA. Hospitals in Arizona were excluded from the estimates for expansion states due to incomplete revenue data. Non-expansion states include AL, FL, ID, IN, KS, OK, TN, TX, WI. Source: Ascension Health |
Table 2: Distribution of Ascension Health Inpatient Discharges, by Payer, 2013-2014 | ||||||
2013 | 2014 | |||||
Quarter ending June 30 |
Quarter ending Sept. 30 |
Quarter ending Dec. 31 |
Quarter ending March 31 |
Quarter ending June 30 |
Quarter ending Sept. 30 |
|
Total discharges for Ascension system | 194,736 | 193,582 | 189,711 | 185,575 | 189,160 | 189,458 |
Percent distribution of discharges by payer | ||||||
Medicaid | 15.1 | 15.2 | 15.6 | 15.6 | 16.2 | 17.0 |
Medicare | 47.5 | 46.3 | 46.3 | 47.4 | 46.8 | 45.6 |
Commercial | 27.5 | 27.2 | 27.8 | 27.2 | 27.9 | 28.3 |
Uninsured/self-pay | 5.6 | 6.2 | 5.6 | 6.1 | 5.1 | 4.7 |
Other | 4.3 | 5.0 | 4.8 | 3.6 | 4.0 | 4.5 |
Total discharges in expansion states | 65,805 | 65,245 | 64,819 | 62,227 | 63,535 | 63,700 |
Percent distribution of discharges by payer | ||||||
Medicaid | 16.8 | 17.4 | 17.4 | 17.4 | 18.6 | 21.2 |
Medicare | 49.5 | 48.3 | 48.3 | 49.1 | 49.6 | 46.7 |
Commercial | 27.1 | 27.0 | 27,4 | 26.8 | 27.1 | 27.4 |
Uninsured/self-pay | 3.7 | 4.0 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 2.3 | 2.1 |
Other | 3.0 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 2.4 | 2.7 |
Total discharges non-expansion states | 128,931 | 128,337 | 124,892 | 123,348 | 125,625 | 125,758 |
Percent distribution of discharges by payer | ||||||
Medicaid | 14.3 | 14.2 | 14.7 | 14.7 | 15.0 | 14.9 |
Medicare | 46.5 | 45.3 | 45.3 | 46.6 | 45.3 | 45.0 |
Commercial | 27.7 | 27.4 | 28.0 | 27.4 | 28.3 | 28.8 |
Uninsured/self-pay | 6.6 | 7.2 | 6.4 | 7.3 | 6.5 | 6.0 |
Other | 4.9 | 5.9 | 5.7 | 4.0 | 4.9 | 5.3 |
Note: Expansion states include CT, DC, IL, MD, MI, NY, WA.
Hospitals in Arizona were excluded from the estimates for expansion states due to incomplete revenue data. Non-expansion states include AL, FL, ID, IN, KS, OK, TN, TX, WI.
Source: Ascension Health |
Table 3: Changes in Ascension Health Total Patient Revenue, by Payer, 2013-2014 | ||||
Q2-4, 2013 ($ millions) |
Q1-3, 2014 ($ millions) |
Δ,
2013-2014
($ millions) |
% Δ,
2013-2014
|
|
Total for Ascension system | $13,278 | $13,542 | $264 | 2.0% |
Medicaid | $1,500 | $1,458 | -$42 | -2.8% |
Commercial | $4,144 | $4,251 | $107 | 2.6% |
Medicare | $4,763 | $4,931 | $168 | 3.5% |
Self-pay | $1,611 | $1,465 | -$146 | -9.1% |
Other | $1,261 | $1,438 | 177 | 14.0% |
Total in expansion states | $4,209 | $4,264 | $55 | 1.3% |
Medicaid | $560 | $606 | $46 | 8.2% |
Commercial | $1,101 | $1,103 | $2 | 0.2% |
Medicare | $1,732 | $1,788 | $56 | 3.2% |
Self-pay | $287 | $106 | -$181 | -63.2% |
Other | $530 | $661 | $132 | 24.8% |
Total in non-expansion states | $9,069 | $9,278 | $209 | 2.3% |
Medicaid | $940 | $852 | -$88 | -9.4% |
Commercial | $3,043 | $3,148 | $105 | 3.5% |
Medicare | $3,031 | $3,143 | $112 | 3.7% |
Self-pay | $1,324 | $1,359 | $35 | 2.6% |
Other | $731 | $777 | $46 | 6.3% |
Note: Expansion states include CT, DC, IL, MD, MI, NY, WA. Hospitals in Arizona wereexcluded from the estimates for expansion states due to incomplete revenue data. Non-expansion states include AL, FL, ID, IN, KS, OK, TN, TX, WI. Source: Ascension Health |
Table 4: Distribution of Ascension Health Hospital Revenue by Payer | ||
Q2-4,
2013
|
Q1-3,
2014
|
|
Total for Ascension system | $13,278 | $13,542 |
Medicaid | 11.3% | 10.8% |
Commercial | 31.2% | 31.4% |
Medicare | 35.9% | 36.4% |
Self-pay | 12.1% | 10.8% |
Other | 9.5% | 10.6% |
Total in expansion states | $4,209 | $4,264 |
Medicaid | 13.3% | 14.2% |
Commercial | 26.2% | 25.9% |
Medicare | 41.1% | 41.9% |
Self-pay | 6.8% | 2.5% |
Other | 12.6% | 15.5% |
Total in non-expansion states | $9,069 | $9,278 |
Medicaid | 10.4% | 9.2% |
Commercial | 33.6% | 33.9% |
Medicare | 33.4% | 33.9% |
Self-pay | 14.6% | 14.6% |
Other | 8.1% | 8.4% |
Note: Expansion states include CT, DC, IL, MD, MI, NY, WA. Hospitals in Arizona wereexcluded from the estimates for expansion states due to incomplete revenue data. Non-expansion states include AL, FL, ID, IN, KS, OK, TN, TX, WI. Source: Ascension Health |
Table 5: Change in Ascension Health’s Cost of Care to the Poor, 2013-2014 | ||||
Q2-4,
2013
($ millions)
|
Q1-3,
2014
($ millions)
|
Δ,
2013-2014
($ millions)
|
% Δ,
2013-2014
|
|
Charity care costs | $453 | $395 | -$58 | -12.8% |
Expansion states | $85 | $50 | -$35 | -40.1% |
Non-expansion states | $368 | $345 | -$23 | -6.2% |
Medicaid shortfalls | $383 | $505 | $122 | 31.9% |
Expansion states | $106 | $129 | $23 | 21.7% |
Non-expansion states | $277 | $376 | $99 | 35.5% |
Net cost of direct care provision to the poor1 | $836 | $900 | $64 | 7.7% |
Expansion states | $191 | $179 | -$12 | -6.3% |
Non-expansion states | $645 | $721 | $76 | 11.8% |
1Includes the sum of charity care costs and Medicaid shortfalls Note: Expansion states include CT, DC, IL, MD, MI, NY, WA. Hospitals in Arizona wereexcluded from the estimates for expansion states due to incomplete revenue data. Non-expansion states include AL, FL, ID, IN, KS, OK, TN, TX, WI. Source: Ascension Health |
Supplementary Table 1: Distribution of Ascension Health Inpatient Discharges by State, 2014 | |
Share of Discharges | |
States with Ascension Health hospitals that expanded Medicaid | |
Total | 211,092 |
Arizona | 10.2 |
Connecticut | 6.3 |
D.C. | 3.9 |
Illinois | 14.3 |
Maryland | 6.0 |
Michigan | 52.4 |
New York | 6.1 |
Washington | 0.8 |
States with Ascension Health hospitals that did not expand Medicaid | |
Total | 374,731 |
Alabama | 10.9 |
Florida | 14.4 |
Idaho | 1.0 |
Indiana | 15.8 |
Kansas | 8.9 |
Oklahoma | 7.8 |
Tennessee | 11.3 |
Texas | 16.9 |
Wisconsin | 13.1 |
Source: Ascension Health |
Supplementary Table 2: Pre-ACA uninsured rates and 2013 and 2014 adult Medicaid income eligibility limits for states with Ascension Health hospitals | |||||
Uninsured rate in 2013(as a share of total state population) | Medicaid income eligibility limits for working parents(as a share of poverty) | Medicaid income eligibility limits for childless adults(as a share of poverty) | |||
2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | ||
States with Ascension Health hospitals that expanded Medicaid | |||||
Total | |||||
Arizona | 19% | 106% | 138% | 100% (closed) | 138% |
Connecticuta | 9% | 191% | 201% | 70% | 138% |
D.C. a | 8% | 206% | 221% | 211% | 215% |
Illinois | 11% | 139% | 138% | 0 | 138% |
Maryland | 10% | 122% | 138% | 0 | 138% |
Michigan | 11% | 64% | 138% | 0 | 138% |
New York | 9% | 150% | 138% | 100% | 138% |
Washington | 11% | 71% | 138% | 0 | 138% |
States with Ascension Health hospitals that did not expand Medicaid | |||||
Total | |||||
Alabama | 16% | 23% | 16% | 0 | 0 |
Florida | 19% | 56% | 35% | 0 | 0 |
Idaho | 14% | 37% | 27% | 0 | 0 |
Indianab | 12% | 24% | 24% | 0 | 0 |
Kansas | 10% | 31% | 38% | 0 | 0 |
Oklahomab | 14% | 51% | 48% | 0 | 0 |
Tennessee | 13% | 122% | 111% | 0 | 0 |
Texas | 20% | 25% | 19% | 0 | 0 |
Wisconsinc | 9% | 200% | 100% | 0 | 100% |
Notes: Income eligibility for parents based on a family of three; income eligibility for childless adults based on an individual. a. Connecticut and the District of Columbia had previously expanded Medicaid to parents with incomes above 138% FPL and are maintaining these higher limits. b. These states currently have additional coverage for parents or other adults above state plan limits through a section 1115 demonstration. The demonstrations include limits on eligibility and/or benefits, do not offer coverage to all residents of the state, and/or include an enrollment cap. Indiana received approval to implement the Medicaid expansion through a waiver with coverage beginning in February 2015, so for purposes of this analysis and the dates under review, Indiana is considered a non-expansion state. c. Wisconsin has a waiver to provide full Medicaid coverage to parents and childless adults up to 100% FPL as of January 1, 2014. Sources: Uninsured rate from: 2014 Current Population Survey, Annual Social Economic Supplement, as reported on Kaiser State Health Facts website. https://www.kff.org/other/state-indicator/total-population/ Medicaid eligibility from: Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured. Medicaid Eligibility for Adults as of January 1, 2014. October 1, 2013. Available at: https://www.kff.org/medicaid/fact-sheet/medicaid-eligibility-for-adults-as-of-january-1-2014/ |