Medical Liability Reforms: Comparison of the Candidates’ Proposals
Medical Liability Reforms: Comparison of Candidate’s Proposals
- Supports a $250,000 cap on non-economic damages and a reasonable cap on punitive damages.
- Supports limiting a party’s share of total damages to their proportionate share of blame for the injury inflicted.
- Supports action to allow providers to review best practices without fear of litigation.
- Opposes capping damages.
- Supports limiting lawsuits to cases where a qualified specialist determines a reasonable claim exists.
- Supports sanctions for claims and defenses without merit, including the loss of lawyers’ ability to file these suits.
- Supports requiring non-binding mediation before a lawsuit can be brought.
- Supports punitive damages only for intentional misconduct, gross negligence or reckless indifference to life.
also of interest
- Workplace Wellness Programs Characteristics and Requirements
- Comparison of Consumer Protections in Three Health Insurance Markets: Medicare Advantage, Qualified Health Plans and Medicaid Managed Care Organizations
- Medical Debt Among People With Health Insurance
- Quantifying the Effects of Health Insurance Rate Review